RTET SARKARI NAUKRI News शिक्षक भर्ती से वंचित अभ्यर्थियों की बैठक कल

RTET  SARKARI NAUKRI News

शिक्षक भर्ती से वंचित अभ्यर्थियों की बैठक कल


डूंगरपुर| तृतीयश्रेणी शिक्षक भर्ती परीक्षा 2013 में कटऑफ से नजदीक वाले अभ्यर्थियों की बैठक मंगलवार को सुबह 11 बजे एसबीपी कॉलेज डूंगरपुर में होगी। अभ्यर्थी गोपालकृष्ण और भुपेंद्र बोडात ने बताया कि भर्ती परीक्षा में पहले से सरकारी नौकरी में कार्यरत अभ्यर्थी जिन्होंने अनापत्ति प्रमाण पत्र प्रस्तुत नहीं किया है। ऐसे में इन अभ्यर्थियों के कारण कट ऑफ के आसपास रहने वाले योग्य अभ्यर्थी को मौका नहीं मिला। इसको लेकर अभ्यर्थियों की बैठक मंगलवार को होगी।


News Sabhar :
Bhaskar News NetworkMar 09, 2015, 04:40 AM IST

RTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher Eligibility Test Updates / Teacher Recruitment  /SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  / SARKARI NAUKRI News

http://joinrtet.blogspot.com/

TET SARKARI NAUKRI News - SUPREME COURT ON TET TEACHER MATTER ISSUE FOR RAJASTHAN TEACHER SELECTION - JUDGEMENT - HIGHLIGHT OF DECISION >>>

TET SARKARI NAUKRI   News   -
SUPREME COURT ON TET TEACHER MATTER ISSUE FOR RAJASTHAN TEACHER SELECTION - JUDGEMENT - HIGHLIGHT OF DECISION >>>

DECISION WAS ANNOUNCED ON 20TH MAY 2011 >>>>


GRADUATION / MASTERS DEGREE MEIN 45% MARKS VAALON KO BHEE CHOOT MILEE HAI TET KARNE KE LIYE, AGAR UNHONE ADMISSION NCTE KE NOTIFICATION KE AANE SE PEHLE AUR USKE QUALIFICATION KE ANUROOP LIYA HAI


QUESTIONS ARISES >>>>

“(A) Whether in absence of any eligibility or qualification in the rules the State Government can be permitted to conduct TET without amending the service rules made under Article 309,Constitution of India on the basis of notification dated 23.08.2010 which the Division Bench held vide order dated 13.4.2011 that it is not statutory in character?

(B) Whether in view of the fact that stay order was in existence on 06.05.2011 upon conducting the TET in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3749/2011 an order for modifying the order dated 15.4.2011 passed in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3068/2011 could be made allowing the State Government to go ahead with conducting the TET examination?

(C) Whether once opinion is expressed by the Division Bench that notification dated 23.8.2010 is not statutory in character, the learned Single Bench can pass order permitting the State Government to conduct TET examination which is not even enumerated in the service rules as eligibility or qualification on the basis of notification dated 23.8.2010 which is admittedly found to be administrative instruction by the Division Bench?

(D) Whether in absence of eligibility prescribed in the rules the State Government will suffer any irreparable injury in not conducting TET till adjudication of the matter and whether while conducting TET and declaring any candidate unsuccessful and thereby denying consideration for appointment on the post of Teacher under the existing rules is legal?

(E) Whether the State Government can withhold recruitment on the ground that first they will conduct TET and thereafter proceed for prescribing qualification in the rules?”

*******************
IMPORTANT POINTS CONSIDERED >>>

(1) of the Act of 2009 had laid down the minimum qualifications for being eligible for appointment as Teacher in Class I to VIII in a school referred to in clause (n) of Section 2 of the Act of 2009. Such Notification could not have been issued in view of availability of persons under section 23. It could have been done only in cases where there are no adequate institutions offering course or training in teacher education are available with the State Government

******************
NCTE KO KENDRA SARKAR /RTE ACT DWARA QUALIFICATION TAY KARNE KE LIYE ADHIKRAT KIYAA GAYAA HAI >>>

The guidelines for conducting TET as contained in P/6 provides that the implementation of the Act of 2009 requires the recruitment of a large number of teachers. It is necessary to ensure that persons recruited as teachers possess the essential aptitude and ability to meet the challenges of teaching at the primary and upper primary level Class I to VIII. Section 23 (1) of the Act of 2009 provides for minimum qualifications as laid down by the Academic Authority, authorized by the Central Government by notification. NCTE has been authorized by the Central Government to lay down  minimum qualifications and vide notification dated 23^rd August, 2010, NCTE has notified minimum qualifications, which are essential for teaching in any school as referred to in clause (n) of section 2 of the Act of 2009. It is necessary that incumbent 

should pass TET which will be conducted by the appropriate 

Government.

*******

Teacher appointed before the date of this Notification.- The following categories of teachers appointed for classes I to VIII prior to date of this Notification need not acquire the minimum qualifications specified in Para (i) above.

(a) A teacher appointed on or after the 3^rd September, 2001 i.e. the date on which the NCTE (Determination of Minimum Qualifications for Recruitment of Teachers in Schools) Regulations, 2001 (as amended from time to time) came into force, in accordance with that Regulation.

Provided that a teacher of class I to V possessing B.Ed. Qualification, or a teacher possessing B.Ed. (Special education) or D.Ed. (Special Education) qualification shall undergo an NCTE recognized 6- month special programme on elementary education.

(b) A teacher of class I to V with B.Ed. Qualification who has completed a 6-month Special Basic Teacher Course (Special BTC) approved by the NCTE.

(c) A teacher appointed before the 3rd September, 2001, in accordance with the prevalent Recruitment Rules.

****************************
RTE ACT KE AANE SE PEHLE NCTE REGULATION 2001 FOLLOW KIYA JAYEGAA >>

Teacher appointed after the date of this Notification in certain cases.- Where an appropriate Government or local authority or a school has issued an advertisement to initiate the process of appointment of teachers prior to the date of this Notification, such appointments may be made in accordance with the NCTE (Determination of Minimum Qualifications for Recruitment of Teachers in Schools) Regulations, 2001 (as amended from time to time).

*******************
2009 KE NOTIFICATION MEIN GRADUATE WITH 50% MARKS QUALIFICATION PRESCRIBE KEE GAYEE HAI  >>>

In the Notification dated 31.8.2009, the eligibility criteria laid down was to the effect that candidates with atleast 50% marks either in the Bachelor's Degree and/or in the Master's degree or any other qualification equivalent thereto, were eligible for admission to the programme.
*************

27TH  SEPTEMBER KE NOTIFICATION MEIN BACHELOR DEGREE YA FIR MASTERS DEGREE MEIN 45% MARKS KI QUALIFICATION PRESCRIBED KEE GAYEE HAI

having 45% marks either in the Bachelor's Degree or in the Master's degree or any other qualification equivalent thereto, were eligible for admission with effect from 27.9.2007 and 50% marks with effect from 31.8.2009
***********************

The implementation of the Act of 2009 requires recruitment of large number of teachers and it is desirable to ensure that quality requirement for recruitment of teachers are not diluted at any cost and thus, it is necessary to ensure that persons recruited as teachers possess the essential aptitude

, it has been considered appropriate to ensure that the children, who are future of the Nation, are efficiently taught by the qualified incumbents and for that if TET was prescribed, such prescription cannot be said to be illegal or arbitrary or impermissible at al

******************
open to the NCTE to lay down such qualifications and they cannot be circumvented by the petitioners in the manner they have suggested. They are bound by the qualifications prescribed in the notification dated 23.8.2010. Only in case they had obtained admission in the requisite course prior to 27.9.2007 or 31.8.2009 as the case may be, without violating the norms of NCTE, they can be permitted to appear in the TET not otherwise. In case they have not taken admission in the requisite course prior to 27.9.2007 or 31.8.2009 and they were not having minimum percentage and qualifications as prescribed vide notifications dated 27.9.2007 or 31.8.2009 even though such qualifications were not applicable in Jammu and Kashmir
*********************

The learned counsel for the petitioners have relied upon the decision of Allahabad High Court in Kanhiya Lal V/s State of UP and ors. (decided on 5^th January, 2010) in which Allahabad High Court has observed that there was valid reason for not treating incumbents obtaining degree from Jammu & Kashmir eligible for admission for Special B.T.C. Course. If the Government decides that such educational qualification, which fulfil the minimum standard set by NCTE would be valid qualification for admission in Special B.T.C. the decision of the Government cannot be treated to be per se illegal as the Bar created in NCTE Act admittedly applies to the State of UP.
********************

UP GOVT NE D ED KO BTC KE EQUIVALAENTIN NAHIN MANA THAA,
SUPREME COURT NE KAHA KI YE RAJYA KA POLICY DECISION HAI.

SUPREME COURT TABHEE HASTAKSHEP KAR SKATEE HAI JAB KAHIN STATUTORY POLICY YA CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION KA VIOLATION HO RAHA HO >>>>>

The respondent admittedly got appointment after the Circular dated 11.8.1997 and hence this circular applies to him. Admittedly, the respondent does not possess the qualification mentioned in the said circular. He does not either possess BTC, Hindustani Teaching Certificate, JCT or Certificate of Teaching. The DEd Certificate is no longer regarded as equivalent to BTC after the Circular dated 11.8.1997. This was a policy decision of the U.P. Government, and it is well settled that the court cannot interfere with policy decision of the Government unless it is in violation of some statutory or constitutional provision. Hence, we are of the opinion that the respondent was not entitled to be appointed as Assistant Master of a junior basic school in U.P.15. Grant of equivalence and/or revocation of equivalence is an administrative decision which is in the sole discretion of the authority concerned, and the court has nothing to do with such matters.

The matter of equivalence is decided by experts appointed by the Government, and the court does not have expertise in such matters. Hence, it should exercise judicial restraint and not interfere in it.”

*************************
45% MARKS VS 50% MARKS IN GRADUATION KE MAMLE MEIN SUPREME COURT NE KAHA KEEE AGAR ADMISSION NOTIFICATION KI DATE SE PEHLE LIYA HO TAB AAPKO RAHAT MIL SAKTEE HAI  >>>

notifications dated 27.9.2007 and 31.8.2009. In case they obtained admission before the said dates in the requisite courses in Jammu & Kashmir, obviously their qualification would be recognized and they can stake their claim in the TET otherwise not.

************************

JO TEACHER  RTE ACT NOTIFICATION KE AANE SE PEHLE KAAM KAR RAHE HAIN, UNKE LIYE NCTE 1 MAHINE KE ANDAR BATAYE KI KISKO CHOOT MIL SAKTEE HAI AUR KISKO NAHIN >>>>>>>>>>>>

we direct the NCTE to specify in State of Rajasthan categories of Teachers, which are exempted as per para 4 of the said Notification. Let it be done within a period of one month

Coming to the submission raised by the petitioners that as they are already working as Teachers, they should be exempted from appearing in the TET. With respect to the aforesaid prayer, provision has been made in para 4 of the Notification dated 23rd August, 2010, which provides that categories of teachers mentioned in para 4(a) to (c) appointed for classes I to VIII prior to date of this Notification need not acquire the minimum qualifications specified in para (1) of the said Notification. Para 4(a) provides a teacher appointed on or after the 3rd September, 2001 i.e. the date on which the NCTE (Determination of Minimum Qualifications for Recruitment of Teachers in Schools) Regulations, 2001 (as amended from time to time) came into force, in accordance with that Regulation. Provided that a teacher of class I to V possessing B.Ed. qualification, or a teacher possessing B.Ed. (Special education) or D.Ed. (Special Education) qualification shall undergo an NCTE recognized 6-month special programme on elementary education. Para 4 (b) provides a teacher of class I to V with B.Ed. Qualification who has completed a 6-month Special Basic Teacher Course (Special BTC) approved by the NCTE. Para 4(c) provides a teacher appointed before the 3rd September, 2001, in accordance with the prevalent Recruitment Rules. In case the petitioners fall in the aforesaid categories of teachers, obviously they are not supposed to undergo TET. Since there are various kind of teachers appointed under the Rules in Rajasthan, we direct the NCTE to specify in State of Rajasthan categories of Teachers, which are exempted as per para 4 of the said Notification. Let it be done within a period of one month.

***************************
(A) Whether in absence of any eligibility or qualification in the rules the State Government can be permitted to conduct TET without amending the service rules made under Article 309,Constitution of India on the basis of notification dated 23.08.2010 which the Division Bench held vide order dated 13.4.2011 that it is not statutory in character?

“Answer to question (A):-

The State Government has amended the Service Rules and even otherwise, in our opinion, as Notification dated 23rd August, 2010 was having statutory force of Section 23(1) of the Act of 2009, it was open to the NCTE to prescribe holding of TET even without amending the Service Rules. However, as already stated, Rajasthan Punchayati Raj Rules,1996 have been amended vide notification dated 11.5.2011. Thus, question (A) stands answered accordingly.

----------------

RAJASTHAN PANCHAYTEE RAJ NE RTE ACT KO APPNA LIYAA, ISLEEYE KOEE SAMASYA NAIN HAI

***************************

(B) Whether in view of the fact that stay order was in existence on 06.05.2011 upon conducting the TET in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3749/2011 an order for modifying the order dated 15.4.2011 passed in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3068/2011 could be made allowing the State Government to go ahead with conducting the TET examination?

Answer to question (B):-

The question (B) has assumed academic significance as we have heard the matters and decided the same on merits by this common order.

****************************
(C) Whether once opinion is expressed by the Division Bench that notification dated 23.8.2010 is not statutory in character, the learned Single Bench can pass order permitting the State Government to conduct TET examination which is not even enumerated in the service rules as eligibility or qualification on the basis of notification dated 23.8.2010 which is admittedly found to be administrative instruction by the Division Bench?

Answer to question (C)-

As to question (C), we are of the opinion that since Notification dated 23rd August, 2010 was issued under section 23(1) of the Act of 2009, therefore, it has statutory force. Apart from this, the State Government has amended the Service Rules. Even otherwise, it was open to the NCTE to prescribe conducting of TET. The notification dated 23.8.2010 cannot be said to be administrative instructions, it has legislative force. The prescription of eligibility qualifications has statutory force.

-----------
 RTE ACT EK KANOONEE PRAVDHAN HAI NA KI KOEE PRSASHNIK 

NIRDESH. IS ACT ARTHAAT KANOON KA PAALAN KARNA HEE HAI


************************************

(D) Whether in absence of eligibility prescribed in the rules the State Government will suffer any irreparable injury in not conducting TET till adjudication of the matter and whether while conducting TET and declaring any candidate unsuccessful and thereby denying consideration for appointment on the post of Teacher under the existing rules is legal?

Answer to question (D)-

The question (D) has been rendered unnecessary in view of the final decision being rendered by us. Apart from this, the question has assumed academic importance as the Service Rules has been amended prescribing conducting of TET.

Holding of TET is necessary for manning the teachers in the various schools at large. Thus, non-holding of TET would be detrimental to the public interest as primary and upper primary schools cannot be left without qualified teachers which is dependent upon holding of TET. Hence, holding of TET is necessary for the interest of the children.

***************************

(E) Whether the State Government can withhold recruitment on the ground that first they will conduct TET and thereafter proceed for prescribing qualification in the rules?”

Answer to question (E)

As already stated above, holding of TET is necessary for the recruitment to be made in the schools. Thus, there is no question of State Government withholding recruitment as after TET, recruitment is open to be made.

For the reasons stated above, the interim stay is vacated. The respondents are free to hold the TET examination. The prayer of the petitioners regarding inclusion of qualification of B.Com. in the group of qualification of graduation in the eligibility criteria has already been allowed. The respondents shall not insist on the qualification of having 45% or 50% marks, as the case may be, in the bachelor's degree or master's degree etc. or any other equivalent qualification, in case incumbents have obtained admission in the requisite courses such as B.A., B.Com., B.Sc., B.Ed., B.El.Ed, Senior Secondary etc. prior to prescription of the minimum qualifying marks by NCTE vide notifications dated 27.9.2007 and 31.8.2009. It is made clear that the incumbents, who have obtained the B.Ed. etc. before the minimum qualifications were prescribed vide notifications dated 27.9.2007 and 31.8.2009, shall be allowed to appear in the TET Examination. The incumbents, who have passed out B.Ed. Course from Jammu & Kashmir, have to be dealt with on similar yard sticks in case the qualification is otherwise recognized. Let NCTE specify categories of teachers under para 4 of Notification dated 23.8.2010. As prayed by NCTE, let amended notification be issued within one month covering aforesaid aspects.

With the aforesaid directions, the writ petitions stand disposed of accordingly. The stay applications also stand disposed.

*********************************




 UPTET  /RTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com


CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

TET SARKARI NAUKRI News - SUPREME COURT ON TET TEACHER MATTER ISSUE FOR RAJASTHAN TEACHER SELECTION - JUDGEMENT PART -1

TET SARKARI NAUKRI   News   -
SUPREME COURT ON TET TEACHER MATTER ISSUE FOR RAJASTHAN TEACHER SELECTION - JUDGEMENT PART -1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AT JODHPUR
1. D.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3964/2011
Sushil Sompura & Ors. Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
2. D.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2584/2011
Mahendra Singh & Ors. Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
3. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3061/2011
Narayan Lal & Ors. Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
4. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3205/2011
Pawan Kumar & Anr. Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
5. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3210/2011
Shaitan Singh Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
6. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3223/2011
Vijaylakshmi Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
7. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3224/2011
Jeevan Singh Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
8. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3225/2011
Sangeeta Hada Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
9. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3249/2011
Narendra Kumar Delu & Ors. Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
10. D.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3258/2011
Asu Ram Jatiya & Ors. Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
11. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3261/2011
Jai Kishan Saharan & ors. Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
12. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3267/2011
Deena Ram & Ors. Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
13. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3273/2011
Govind Singh & Ors. Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
14. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3274/2011
Mahesh Dave & Ors. Vs. State (Education) & ors.
15. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3275/2011
Mahaveer Prasad Bagerwal & Ors. Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
16. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3277/2011
Ghewar Singh Rathore & Ors. Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
17. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3280/2011
Ugam Singh & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
2
18. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3282/2011
Rakesh Kumar Utreja & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
19. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3283/2011
Raj Kumar Joshi Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
20. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3284/2011
Sunil Kumar Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
21. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3286/2011
Hari Om Sharma & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
22. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3290/2011
Gajendra Singh Ranawat & ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
23. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3318/2011
Seema Jalori & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & ors.
24. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3320/2011
Sahadev Ram & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
25. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3321/2011
Ved Prakash & ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & ors.
26. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3324/2011
Pawan Kumar Pareek & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
27. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3327/2011
Jagram & Ors. Vs. State (Ele. Education) & Ors.
28. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3331/2011
Bhupendra & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
29. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3341/2011
Sanjay Kumar & ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
30. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3342/2011
Deen Dayal Sharma & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
31. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3390/2011
Tarun Paliwal & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & ors.
32. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3696/2011
Susheela Kumari & Anr. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
33. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3848/2011
Narna Ram & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
34. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3913/2011
Umed Singh & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
35. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4105/2011
Bharat Kamliya (Salvi) & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
3
36. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4106/2011
Akram Ansari & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
37. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4108/2011
Maniram & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
38. D.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4403/2011
Laxman Lal Patel & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
39. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4416/2011
Hanuman Singh Rathore Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
40. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4417/2011
Om Prakash & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & ors.
41. D.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4421/2011
Vijender Kumar Sharma & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & ors.
42. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4436/2011
Maha Prakash Sharma & Os. Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
43. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4444/2011
Mangu Singh Bhati & Anr. Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
Date of Order : : 20.05.2011
PRESENT
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ARUN MISHRA
HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE KAILASH CHANDRA JOSHI
Mr.P.R.Mehta ]
Mr.P.S.Chundawat ]
Mr.Shambhoo Singh ]
Mr.S.R.Godara ]
Mr.Narpat Singh ]
Mr.H.S.Sidhu ]
Mr.G.R.Bhari ]
Mr.Vishwajeet Joshi ]
Mr.D.S.Sodha ]
Mr.Awar Dan Charan ]
Mr.Trilok Joshi ]
Mr.Pankaj Sharma ]
Mr.Tribhuva Gupta ]
Mr.V.N.Kalla ]-for the petitioners.
Mr.Sandeep Saruparia ]
Mr.Sunil Beniwal ]
Mr.R.S.Charan ]
Mr.Sukesh Bhati ]
Mr.Vijay Raj Bishnoi ]
Mr.R.C.Joshi ]
Mr.V.R.Choudhary ]
Mr.Manoj Purohit ]
Mr.Manish Patel ]
Mr.O.P.Kumawat ]
Mr.Rohitash Singh ]
Mr.Vikas Bijarnia ]
Mr.B.S.Sandhu ]
Mr.Sumer Singh ]
Mr.Anand Purohit, AAG ]
4
Mr.Kuldeep Mathur ]
Mr.K.R.Bishnoi ]
Mr.D.S.Gaur ]
Mr.Rakesh Arora ]- for the respondents.
ORDER
BY THE COURT (Per Hon'ble Arun Mishra, CJ)
In these writ petitions, the petitioners have prayed for relief to quash the Gazettee Notification dated 23rd August, 2010 issued by the National Council for Teacher Education (hereinafter referred to as “the NCTE”) in exercise of the powers conferred by  Sub-section (1) of Section 23 of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 2009”) laying down minimum qualifications to be eligible for appointment as a Teacher in Class I to VIII in a school referred to in clause (n) of Section 2 of the Act of 2009. Prayer has also been been made by the  petitioners to quash the condition of having minimum 45% or 50% marks in graduation. In some of the matters, prayer has been made to include the qualification of B.Com. also in graduation. Prayer has also been made to declare that the Notification dated 23.8.2010 shall operate prospectively. In some of the petitions, the petitioners have prayed that as they have passed graduation from the University in Jammu and Kashmir, the respondents be directed to ignore the minimum percentage in the graduation. Prayer has also been made in some of the petitions that Vidhyarthi Mitra and Serva Shiksha Karmik (CRCF) may not be compelled to qualify the Teacher Eligibility Test (hereinafter referred to as “the TET”).




 UPTET  /RTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com


CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

FLIPKART - Elegenze Self Design Fashion Georgette, Chiffon, Net #Sari - RECOMMENDED TO #BUY

#FLIPKART - Elegenze Self Design Fashion Georgette, Chiffon, Net #Sari - RECOMMENDED TO #BUY


SEE OUR NEW SITE FOR FLIPKART, SNAPDEAL AND AMAZON OFFERS :- http://flipkartsaleonline.blogspot.com/
 
FLIPKART REDUCED ITS PRICE RATE FROM RS 850 TO RS 695 ,

EARLIER COST OF THIS SARI WAS RS 900/- 

FLIPKART AGAIN REDUCED PRICE ON THIS SARI PRODUCT , RECOMMENDED TO BUY OR GIFT SOMEBODY

 ***********************
LAST WEEK PRICE >>> RS 695/-

SEE DETAILS >> CLICK HERE

SEE REVIEWS HERE >>>>

★★★★★

Chirag Mandaliya

May 13, 2014

price wise best saree

this is the best product i have seen in the flipkart. Such saree at this price is unbeatable. Material is too good. blouse is awesomeer A++++ ---------------

★★★★★

Prerna Srivastava

May 5, 2014

Amazing product

Saree is too good, specially the jacquard net fabric for sleeves that is sent along with the saree. Loved the shipping time. Flipkart rocks


Best Deal FLIPKART SNAPDEAL AMAZON on Mobile , Laptop and Other Clothing, Home Furnishing and Gift Accesories - http://flipkartsaleonline.blogspot.com Flipkart Best Deal

RTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - तृतीय श्रेणी शिक्षक भर्ती: एक और गड़बड़ी आई सामने

RTET  SARKARI NAUKRI  News -
तृतीय श्रेणी शिक्षक भर्ती: एक और गड़बड़ी आई सामने

RTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher Eligibility Test Updates / Teacher Recruitment  /SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  / SARKARI NAUKRI /  News

http://joinrtet.blogspot.com/

तृतीय श्रेणी शिक्षक भर्ती: एक और गड़बड़ी आई सामने

Patrika news network Posted: 2015-03-02 Updated: 2015-03-02 09:54:30


जयपुर तृतीय श्रेणी शिक्षक भर्ती परीक्षा-2013 में लापरवाही के रिकॉर्ड बनना जारी हैं। पहले प्रश्नपत्रों में गड़बड़ी, फिर उत्तरकुंजी में खामियां और अब कटऑफ सूची में भी लापरवाही सामने आ रही है।

भर्ती परीक्षा में लंबे समय बाद अब कटऑफ सूची जारी हुई थी तो अभ्यर्थियों को उम्मीद बंधी कि उनकी नौकरी लगेगी। अब शनिवार से फिर से कई जिलों की कटऑफ सूचियों में संशोधन हुए हैं, जिससे अभ्यर्थी सकते में हैं। कुछ जिलों में तो नई संशोधित सूची गुपचुप जारी कर दी गई, जिससे अंकों में भारी फेरबदल सामने आ रहा है।

अब अभ्यर्थियों की चिंता यह है कि आखिर दस्तावेज सत्यापन कौन की कटऑफ लिस्ट वाले कराएं। दोनों ही कटऑफ लिस्ट वाले छात्र सोमवार से सत्यापन के लिए पहुंचेंगे।

बीएसटीसी शिक्षक संघ के अध्यक्ष उपेन यादव ने बताया कि मामले में गड़बड़ी सामने आ रही है। जिला परिषदों में गड़बड़ी हुई है इसकी मुख्यमंत्री से शिकायत होगी।

60 प्रतिशत से कम अंक वालों में रोष
शिक्षक भर्ती परीक्षा में फिलहाल उन्हीं अभ्यर्थियों की नियुक्ति प्रक्रिया चल रही है जिनके टेट में 60 प्रतिशत या इससे अधिक अंक हैं। कटऑफ सूची के दायरे में आ रहे टेट में 60 प्रतिशत से कम अंक वाले अभ्यर्थी में रोष है। अभ्यर्थियों ने शनिवार को राजधानी में प्रदर्शन किया था।


फैक्ट फाइल
11 अक्टूबर 2013 को हुई परीक्षा
30 जनवरी 2015 को आया परिणाम
25 जनवरी को उत्तरकुंजी जारी
25 फरवरी को कटऑफ सूची जारी
11 हजार पद प्रथम लेवल में
9 हजार पद द्वितीय स्तर में
5.5 लाख के करीब अभ्यर्थियों ने दी थी परीक्षा

इन जिलों में संशोधन
जालोर (प्रथम स्तर)
ओबीसी
पहले : 150.79, अब : 66.91 (महिला और पुरूष दोनों) सामान्य
पहले : 160.41 (पुरूष), 159.75 (महिला), अब : 156.98 (पुरूष), 153.22 (महिला) अनुसूचित जाति
पहले : 144 (पुरूष), 138.29 (महिला), अब : 113 (पुरूष), 113 (महिला) अनुसूचित जनजाति
पहले : 139.7 (महिला-पुरूष दोनों), अब : 105.20 (महिला-पुरूष दोनों)
बाड़मेर : जो अभ्यर्थी ओबीसी है और सामान्य कटऑफ में शामिल है उसे दोनों श्रेणियों में माना गया है।
धौलपुर : अनुसूचित जाति श्रेणी में कटऑफ में बदलाव
जैसलमेर : कटऑफ में संशोधन

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  , शिक्षक भर्ती
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET

RTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - कई जिलों में तृतीय श्रेणी शिक्षक भर्ती कटऑफ में संशोधन

RTET  SARKARI NAUKRI  News -
 कई जिलों में तृतीय श्रेणी शिक्षक भर्ती कटऑफ में संशोधन

RTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher Eligibility Test Updates / Teacher Recruitment  /SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  / SARKARI NAUKRI /  News

http://joinrtet.blogspot.com/

कई जिलों में तृतीय श्रेणी शिक्षक भर्ती कटऑफ में संशोधन
Bhaskar News Network  Mar 02, 2015, 03:15 AM IST

आज-कल होगी दस्तावेजों की जांच

जयपुर|दस्तावेजजांच से पहले कई जिलों में तृतीय श्रेणी शिक्षक भर्ती परीक्षा की कटऑफ में संशोधन हुआ है। इससे अभ्यर्थी परेशान हो गए हैं। इस परीक्षा की मेरिट में आने वालों के दस्तावेजों के सत्यापन का काम सोमवार मंगलवार को किया जाएगा।

जिला परिषदों में 24 फरवरी को कटऑफ जारी हुई थी, लेकिन अब 27 28 फरवरी को एक बार फिर संशोधित कटऑफ जारी हुई है। जालौर, धौलपुर, बीकानेर अलवर की कटऑफ में संशोधन होने से कई अभ्यर्थी नए शामिल हो गए हैं और कई स्थानों पर पहली कटऑफ में शामिल अभ्यर्थी बाहर हो गए। आरटेट में 60 फीसदी या अधिक अंक प्राप्त करने वाले प्रथम स्तर के अभ्यर्थियों के दस्तावेज सत्यापन 2 मार्च एवं द्वितीय स्तर के अभ्यर्थियों के दस्तावेज सत्यापन 3 मार्च को संबंधित जिला परिषद कार्यालयों में किया जाएगा। वरीयतानुसार डेढ़ गुणा अभ्यर्थियों को दस्तावेज सत्यापन के लिए बुलाया जाएगा। दस्तावेज सत्यापन के पश्चात 16 मार्च तक पात्र सफल अभ्यर्थियों के नाम पंचायत समितियों को नियुक्ति हेतु भेज दिए जाएंगे। चयनित अभ्यर्थियों का पदस्थापन कर उन्हें 15 अप्रैल तक कार्यग्रहण करने का निर्देशित कर दिया जाएगा। 20 हजार पदों के लिए परीक्षा 11 अक्टूबर 2013 को आयोजित की गई थी।

पंचायतीराज विभाग के डिप्टी सेक्रेटरी (ट्रेनिंग) पोकरमल का कहना है कि कुछ जिलों में संशोधित कटऑफ जारी हुई है। वहां डेढ़ गुणा अभ्यर्थियों को बुलाने की गणना सही तरीके से नहीं की गई। इससे कोई फर्क नहीं पड़ेगा। क्योंकि दस्तावेज जांच के बाद ही आगे की प्रक्रिया शुरू होगी।

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  , शिक्षक भर्ती
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET

RTET SARKARI NAUKRI News तृतीय श्रेणी शिक्षक भर्ती परीक्षा के दस्तावेज सत्यापन आज से

RTET  SARKARI NAUKRI News
तृतीय श्रेणी शिक्षक भर्ती परीक्षा के दस्तावेज सत्यापन आज से
Bhaskar News NetworkMar 02, 2015, 05:15 AM IST


जिलापरिषद द्वारा तृतीय श्रेणी शिक्षक भर्ती के लिए अभ्यर्थियों को सोमवार मंगलवार को दस्तावेज सत्यापन के लिए बुलाया गया है। जिला परिषद सीईओ आशुतोष गुप्ता ने बताया कि भर्ती परीक्षा के लिए प्रथम लेवल के 138 द्वितीय लेवल के 255 पदों के लिए डेढ़ गुना अभ्यर्थियों को दस्तावेज सत्यापन के लिए बुलाया गया है। दस्तावेज सत्यापन के लिए बालिया स्कूल में सेंटर बनाया गया है। साथ ही दस्तावेज सत्यापन के लिए सात टीमों का गठन किया गया है।

अभ्यर्थियोंको 12 मार्च को एक और मौका

जिलापरिषद द्वारा अक्टूबर 2013 में आयोजित तृतीय श्रेणी शिक्षक भर्ती परीक्षा के डेढ़ गुना अभ्यर्थी जो 2 3 मार्च को दस्तावेज सत्यापन नहीं करवा सकेंगे। उन अभ्यर्थियों को 12 मार्च को दस्तावेज सत्यापन के एक ओर मौका दिया जाएगा। अभ्यर्थियों को दस्तावेज सत्यापन के लिए 10 से लगाकर उच्च शैक्षणिक योग्यता के प्रमाण पत्रों की सत्यापित कॉपियां साथ लानी होंगी। साथ सभी सहशैक्षणिक गतिविधियों के प्रमाण पत्रों की सत्यापित कॉपी लानी होगी। इसके साथ मूल दस्तावेज साथ में रखना आवश्यक होगा। जिन अभ्यर्थियों के आरटेट में 60 प्रतिशत से ज्यादा अंक प्राप्त किए हैं, दस्तावेज सत्यापन उनका ही होगा।

अंतिम कटऑफ मार्च अंत तक होगी जारी

जिलापरिषद सीईओ आशुतोष गुप्ता ने बताया कि दस्तावेज सत्यापन होने के बाद मार्च के अंत तक अंतिम कटऑफ जारी की जाएगी। इसके बाद जिला स्थापना समिति द्वारा सफल अभ्यर्थियों को पंचायत समितियों का आवंटन किया जाएगा।

RTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher Eligibility Test Updates / Teacher Recruitment  /SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  / SARKARI NAUKRI News

http://joinrtet.blogspot.com/

RTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - द्वितीय श्रेणी शिक्षक भर्ती का परिणाम दुबारा जारी हो

RTET  SARKARI NAUKRI  News -

 द्वितीय श्रेणी शिक्षक भर्ती का परिणाम दुबारा जारी हो

Grade 2nd Teacher Recruitment Rajasthan, Grade 2nd Teacher Recruitment, RTET, RTET

 / टीईटी / TET - Teacher Eligibility Test Updates / Teacher Recruitment  /SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  / SARKARI NAUKRI /  News

http://joinrtet.blogspot.com/

द्वितीय श्रेणी शिक्षक भर्ती का परिणाम दुबारा जारी हो”
February 26, 2015

जयपुर हाईकोर्ट ने सामाजिक विज्ञान विषय के द्वितीय श्रेणी शिक्षकों की भर्ती का परिणाम नए सिरे से घोषित करने को कहा है। साथ ही, कहा कि दो माह में प्रक्रिया पूरी कर नियुक्ति दी जाए।
न्यायाधीश वी एस सिराधना ने राम रतन यादव की याचिका पर यह आदेश दिया। याचिका में कहा कि वर्ष 2008 में सामाजिक विज्ञान विषय के 1023 द्वितीय श्रेणी शिक्षकों की भर्ती प्रक्रिया शुरू हुई, इसकी परीक्षा वर्ष 2011 में हुई।
इसमें दो प्रश्नों पर विवाद आया, तो आरपीएससी ने एक प्रश्न पर याचिकाकर्ता की आपत्ति को सही माना और दूसरे प्रश्न पर आपत्ति को सही नहीं माना।
जनगणना आंकड़ों का हवाला देकर कोर्ट को दूसरे प्रश्न पर आरपीएससी के तर्क को गलत ठहराया। कोर्ट ने सभी पक्ष सुनने के बाद कहा कि नए सिरे से परिणाम जारी हो


CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  , शिक्षक भर्ती
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET

RTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - हाईकोर्ट आदेश: ग्रेड सैकंड शिक्षक भर्ती-08 का परिणाम नए सिरे से दें

RTET  SARKARI NAUKRI  News -

 हाईकोर्ट आदेश: ग्रेड सैकंड शिक्षक भर्ती-08 का परिणाम नए सिरे से दें

RTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher Eligibility Test Updates / Teacher Recruitment  /SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  / SARKARI NAUKRI /  News

http://joinrtet.blogspot.com/

हाईकोर्ट आदेश: ग्रेड सैकंड शिक्षक भर्ती-08 का परिणाम नए सिरे से दें

जोधपुर. हाईकोर्ट ने द्वितीय श्रेणी (सामाजिक विज्ञान) भर्ती 2008 के मामले में 1023 पदों पर सरकार को नए से परिणाम जारी करने और नई कट ऑफ मार्क्स के आधार पर दो महीने में नियुक्ति देने का आदेश दिया है। न्यायाधीश वीएस सिराधना ने यह आदेश राम रतन यादव की याचिका पर दिया। याचिका में कहा कि सरकार ने 13 अगस्त 2008 के विज्ञापन के जरिए द्वितीय श्रेणी (सामाजिक विज्ञान) विषय के 1023 पदों पर भर्ती के अावेदन मांगे। भर्ती परीक्षा में 150 प्रश्न पूछे गए।

भर्ती का परिणाम 2011 में आया। उत्तर कुंजी देखने पर पाया कि आरपीएससी ने उसके दो प्रश्नों के उत्तरों को गलत माना है, जबकि वे सही थे। उधर हाईकोर्ट ने अवैध निर्माण अतिक्रमण मामलों में जेडीए की सख्ती को सही ठहराया। कहा कि अदालत सार्वजनिक संपत्ति पर कब्जा करने वालों को राहत देगा और ही आंखें मूंदकर बैठेगा


Bhaskar News Network|Feb 26, 2015, 06:38AM IST
   Email Print Comment


CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  , शिक्षक भर्ती
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET