REET SARKARI NAUKRI News - सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने कहा आरटेट में छूट सही, Ab RTET mein bhee 55% TET Marks Par Pass Honge, Supreme Court gives its verdict, अतिरिक्त छूट को गलत ठहराया सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने

REET SARKARI NAUKRI  News -

सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने कहा आरटेट में छूट सही,
Ab RTET mein bhee 55% TET Marks Par Pass Honge, Supreme Court gives its verdict,
अतिरिक्त छूट को गलत ठहराया सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने 

Published : बुधवार, 19 अक्टूबर 2016 08:57 AM (IST)  PreviousNext
supreme court says discount in rtet is correct - News in Hindi

जयपुर। सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने राज्य सरकार की ओर से आरटेट-2011 में आरक्षित वर्ग को दिए गए रिजर्वेशन और इसके तहत की गई 2012 में की गई तृतीय श्रेणी शिक्षक भर्ती को सही माना है। न्यायाधीश ए.के. सीकरी व एन.वी. रमाना की खंडपीठ ने यह आदेश राज्य सरकार व अन्य की एसएलपी को मंजूर करते हुए दिया। इसी के साथ सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने राजस्थान हाईकोर्ट की खंडपीठ के 2 जुलाई 2013 के आदेश को भी रद्द कर दिया। इस आदेश के तहत राज्य सरकार द्वारा आरटेट-2011 के परिणाम को रद्द करते हुए 2012 में इसके तहत की गई तृतीय श्रेणी शिक्षकों का परिणाम दोबारा जारी करने तथा दोबारा चयन सूची बनाने को कहा गया था। साथ ही शिक्षा विभाग को भी 8 हजार नए शिक्षक मिलेंगे। इससे स्कूलों में खाली पद भर सकेंगे। राजस्थान एकीकृत बेरोजगार महासंघ के अध्यक्ष उपेन यादव ने इसे बेरोजगारों के लंबे संघर्ष की जीत बताया है।


एनसीटीई की गाइडलाइन के मुताबिक टेट में न्यूनतम 60 फीसदी अंक प्राप्त करने वाला ही शिक्षक भर्ती के योग्य माना गया है। लेकिन तत्कालीन राज्य सरकार ने आरटेट में आरक्षित वर्ग को न्यूनतम उत्तीर्णांक में 5 से 20 प्रतिशत की छूट दी। इस पर कुछ अभ्यर्थियों ने हाईकोर्ट में याचिका दायर की। हाईकोर्ट की पहले एकलपीठ, फिर खंडपीठ ने इसे गलत माना। हाईकोर्ट ने कहा था कि राज्य सरकार की 5 से 20 प्रतिशत अंकों की छूट देना गलत है। आरटेट में 60 प्रतिशत अंक ही जरूरी हैं। इस पर सरकार ने सुप्रीम कोर्ट में एसएलपी दायर की।

अब सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने कहा- छूट देना सही
अब सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने अपने आदेश में कहा कि राज्य सरकार ने अपनी नोटिफिकेशन व सर्कुलर के अनुसार आरटेट में आरक्षित वर्ग को रिजर्वेशन दिया था और सरकार को अपनी नीतियों के तहत रिजर्वेशन देने का अधिकार था। सुप्रीम कोर्ट में सुनवाई के दौरान राज्य सरकार की ओर से अधिवक्ता इरशाद अहमद ने दलील दी कि राज्य सरकार ने नियमानुसार ही आरक्षित वर्ग के अभ्यर्थियों को रिजर्वेशन दिया है और इसमें कोई असंवैधानिक कार्य नहीं किया है। इसलिए हाईकोर्ट के आदेश को रद्द कर एसएलपी मंजूर की जाए


तृतीय श्रेणी शिक्षक भर्ती 2012 में सरकार ने 40 हजार को नियुक्ति दी थी। इसमें से 27 हजार चयनित शिक्षकों के 60 प्रतिशत से अधिक अंक थे और 13 हजार के 60 प्रतिशत से कम। सुप्रीम कोर्ट में मामला होने के कारण इन 13 हजार शिक्षकों की नौकरी पर तलवार लटक रही थी। इनको राहत मिल गई। अब सभी 40 हजार शिक्षकों का स्थायीकरण भी हो सकेगा। हालांकि सरकार इनको नियमित वेतन देने के आदेश दे चुकी थी, लेकिन एरियर बकाया है

तृतीय श्रेणी शिक्षक भर्ती 2013 में सरकार को 20 हजार पदों पर नियुक्ति करनी थी। मामला सुप्रीम कोर्ट में होने के कारण 12 हजार उन चयनितों को नियुक्ति दी गई, जिनके आरटेट में 60त्न से अधिक अंक थे। अब आठ हजार शिक्षकों की नियुक्ति भी हो सकेगी। इस बारे में शिक्षा राज्यमंत्री वासुदेव देवनानी ने कहा कि सुप्रीम कोर्ट के निर्णय से अनिश्चितता खत्म हो सकेगी और अभ्यर्थियों को उनका हक मिलेगा। 


RTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher Eligibility Test Updates / Teacher Recruitment  /SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  / SARKARI NAUKRI /  News

http://joinrtet.blogspot.com/

REET CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  , शिक्षक भर्ती
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET

TET SARKARI NAUKRI News - SUPREME COURT ON TET TEACHER MATTER ISSUE FOR RAJASTHAN TEACHER SELECTION - JUDGEMENT - HIGHLIGHT OF DECISION >>>

TET SARKARI NAUKRI   News   -
SUPREME COURT ON TET TEACHER MATTER ISSUE FOR RAJASTHAN TEACHER SELECTION - JUDGEMENT - HIGHLIGHT OF DECISION >>>

DECISION WAS ANNOUNCED ON 20TH MAY 2011 >>>>


GRADUATION / MASTERS DEGREE MEIN 45% MARKS VAALON KO BHEE CHOOT MILEE HAI TET KARNE KE LIYE, AGAR UNHONE ADMISSION NCTE KE NOTIFICATION KE AANE SE PEHLE AUR USKE QUALIFICATION KE ANUROOP LIYA HAI


QUESTIONS ARISES >>>>

“(A) Whether in absence of any eligibility or qualification in the rules the State Government can be permitted to conduct TET without amending the service rules made under Article 309,Constitution of India on the basis of notification dated 23.08.2010 which the Division Bench held vide order dated 13.4.2011 that it is not statutory in character?

(B) Whether in view of the fact that stay order was in existence on 06.05.2011 upon conducting the TET in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3749/2011 an order for modifying the order dated 15.4.2011 passed in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3068/2011 could be made allowing the State Government to go ahead with conducting the TET examination?

(C) Whether once opinion is expressed by the Division Bench that notification dated 23.8.2010 is not statutory in character, the learned Single Bench can pass order permitting the State Government to conduct TET examination which is not even enumerated in the service rules as eligibility or qualification on the basis of notification dated 23.8.2010 which is admittedly found to be administrative instruction by the Division Bench?

(D) Whether in absence of eligibility prescribed in the rules the State Government will suffer any irreparable injury in not conducting TET till adjudication of the matter and whether while conducting TET and declaring any candidate unsuccessful and thereby denying consideration for appointment on the post of Teacher under the existing rules is legal?

(E) Whether the State Government can withhold recruitment on the ground that first they will conduct TET and thereafter proceed for prescribing qualification in the rules?”

*******************
IMPORTANT POINTS CONSIDERED >>>

(1) of the Act of 2009 had laid down the minimum qualifications for being eligible for appointment as Teacher in Class I to VIII in a school referred to in clause (n) of Section 2 of the Act of 2009. Such Notification could not have been issued in view of availability of persons under section 23. It could have been done only in cases where there are no adequate institutions offering course or training in teacher education are available with the State Government

******************
NCTE KO KENDRA SARKAR /RTE ACT DWARA QUALIFICATION TAY KARNE KE LIYE ADHIKRAT KIYAA GAYAA HAI >>>

The guidelines for conducting TET as contained in P/6 provides that the implementation of the Act of 2009 requires the recruitment of a large number of teachers. It is necessary to ensure that persons recruited as teachers possess the essential aptitude and ability to meet the challenges of teaching at the primary and upper primary level Class I to VIII. Section 23 (1) of the Act of 2009 provides for minimum qualifications as laid down by the Academic Authority, authorized by the Central Government by notification. NCTE has been authorized by the Central Government to lay down  minimum qualifications and vide notification dated 23^rd August, 2010, NCTE has notified minimum qualifications, which are essential for teaching in any school as referred to in clause (n) of section 2 of the Act of 2009. It is necessary that incumbent 

should pass TET which will be conducted by the appropriate 

Government.

*******

Teacher appointed before the date of this Notification.- The following categories of teachers appointed for classes I to VIII prior to date of this Notification need not acquire the minimum qualifications specified in Para (i) above.

(a) A teacher appointed on or after the 3^rd September, 2001 i.e. the date on which the NCTE (Determination of Minimum Qualifications for Recruitment of Teachers in Schools) Regulations, 2001 (as amended from time to time) came into force, in accordance with that Regulation.

Provided that a teacher of class I to V possessing B.Ed. Qualification, or a teacher possessing B.Ed. (Special education) or D.Ed. (Special Education) qualification shall undergo an NCTE recognized 6- month special programme on elementary education.

(b) A teacher of class I to V with B.Ed. Qualification who has completed a 6-month Special Basic Teacher Course (Special BTC) approved by the NCTE.

(c) A teacher appointed before the 3rd September, 2001, in accordance with the prevalent Recruitment Rules.

****************************
RTE ACT KE AANE SE PEHLE NCTE REGULATION 2001 FOLLOW KIYA JAYEGAA >>

Teacher appointed after the date of this Notification in certain cases.- Where an appropriate Government or local authority or a school has issued an advertisement to initiate the process of appointment of teachers prior to the date of this Notification, such appointments may be made in accordance with the NCTE (Determination of Minimum Qualifications for Recruitment of Teachers in Schools) Regulations, 2001 (as amended from time to time).

*******************
2009 KE NOTIFICATION MEIN GRADUATE WITH 50% MARKS QUALIFICATION PRESCRIBE KEE GAYEE HAI  >>>

In the Notification dated 31.8.2009, the eligibility criteria laid down was to the effect that candidates with atleast 50% marks either in the Bachelor's Degree and/or in the Master's degree or any other qualification equivalent thereto, were eligible for admission to the programme.
*************

27TH  SEPTEMBER KE NOTIFICATION MEIN BACHELOR DEGREE YA FIR MASTERS DEGREE MEIN 45% MARKS KI QUALIFICATION PRESCRIBED KEE GAYEE HAI

having 45% marks either in the Bachelor's Degree or in the Master's degree or any other qualification equivalent thereto, were eligible for admission with effect from 27.9.2007 and 50% marks with effect from 31.8.2009
***********************

The implementation of the Act of 2009 requires recruitment of large number of teachers and it is desirable to ensure that quality requirement for recruitment of teachers are not diluted at any cost and thus, it is necessary to ensure that persons recruited as teachers possess the essential aptitude

, it has been considered appropriate to ensure that the children, who are future of the Nation, are efficiently taught by the qualified incumbents and for that if TET was prescribed, such prescription cannot be said to be illegal or arbitrary or impermissible at al

******************
open to the NCTE to lay down such qualifications and they cannot be circumvented by the petitioners in the manner they have suggested. They are bound by the qualifications prescribed in the notification dated 23.8.2010. Only in case they had obtained admission in the requisite course prior to 27.9.2007 or 31.8.2009 as the case may be, without violating the norms of NCTE, they can be permitted to appear in the TET not otherwise. In case they have not taken admission in the requisite course prior to 27.9.2007 or 31.8.2009 and they were not having minimum percentage and qualifications as prescribed vide notifications dated 27.9.2007 or 31.8.2009 even though such qualifications were not applicable in Jammu and Kashmir
*********************

The learned counsel for the petitioners have relied upon the decision of Allahabad High Court in Kanhiya Lal V/s State of UP and ors. (decided on 5^th January, 2010) in which Allahabad High Court has observed that there was valid reason for not treating incumbents obtaining degree from Jammu & Kashmir eligible for admission for Special B.T.C. Course. If the Government decides that such educational qualification, which fulfil the minimum standard set by NCTE would be valid qualification for admission in Special B.T.C. the decision of the Government cannot be treated to be per se illegal as the Bar created in NCTE Act admittedly applies to the State of UP.
********************

UP GOVT NE D ED KO BTC KE EQUIVALAENTIN NAHIN MANA THAA,
SUPREME COURT NE KAHA KI YE RAJYA KA POLICY DECISION HAI.

SUPREME COURT TABHEE HASTAKSHEP KAR SKATEE HAI JAB KAHIN STATUTORY POLICY YA CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION KA VIOLATION HO RAHA HO >>>>>

The respondent admittedly got appointment after the Circular dated 11.8.1997 and hence this circular applies to him. Admittedly, the respondent does not possess the qualification mentioned in the said circular. He does not either possess BTC, Hindustani Teaching Certificate, JCT or Certificate of Teaching. The DEd Certificate is no longer regarded as equivalent to BTC after the Circular dated 11.8.1997. This was a policy decision of the U.P. Government, and it is well settled that the court cannot interfere with policy decision of the Government unless it is in violation of some statutory or constitutional provision. Hence, we are of the opinion that the respondent was not entitled to be appointed as Assistant Master of a junior basic school in U.P.15. Grant of equivalence and/or revocation of equivalence is an administrative decision which is in the sole discretion of the authority concerned, and the court has nothing to do with such matters.

The matter of equivalence is decided by experts appointed by the Government, and the court does not have expertise in such matters. Hence, it should exercise judicial restraint and not interfere in it.”

*************************
45% MARKS VS 50% MARKS IN GRADUATION KE MAMLE MEIN SUPREME COURT NE KAHA KEEE AGAR ADMISSION NOTIFICATION KI DATE SE PEHLE LIYA HO TAB AAPKO RAHAT MIL SAKTEE HAI  >>>

notifications dated 27.9.2007 and 31.8.2009. In case they obtained admission before the said dates in the requisite courses in Jammu & Kashmir, obviously their qualification would be recognized and they can stake their claim in the TET otherwise not.

************************

JO TEACHER  RTE ACT NOTIFICATION KE AANE SE PEHLE KAAM KAR RAHE HAIN, UNKE LIYE NCTE 1 MAHINE KE ANDAR BATAYE KI KISKO CHOOT MIL SAKTEE HAI AUR KISKO NAHIN >>>>>>>>>>>>

we direct the NCTE to specify in State of Rajasthan categories of Teachers, which are exempted as per para 4 of the said Notification. Let it be done within a period of one month

Coming to the submission raised by the petitioners that as they are already working as Teachers, they should be exempted from appearing in the TET. With respect to the aforesaid prayer, provision has been made in para 4 of the Notification dated 23rd August, 2010, which provides that categories of teachers mentioned in para 4(a) to (c) appointed for classes I to VIII prior to date of this Notification need not acquire the minimum qualifications specified in para (1) of the said Notification. Para 4(a) provides a teacher appointed on or after the 3rd September, 2001 i.e. the date on which the NCTE (Determination of Minimum Qualifications for Recruitment of Teachers in Schools) Regulations, 2001 (as amended from time to time) came into force, in accordance with that Regulation. Provided that a teacher of class I to V possessing B.Ed. qualification, or a teacher possessing B.Ed. (Special education) or D.Ed. (Special Education) qualification shall undergo an NCTE recognized 6-month special programme on elementary education. Para 4 (b) provides a teacher of class I to V with B.Ed. Qualification who has completed a 6-month Special Basic Teacher Course (Special BTC) approved by the NCTE. Para 4(c) provides a teacher appointed before the 3rd September, 2001, in accordance with the prevalent Recruitment Rules. In case the petitioners fall in the aforesaid categories of teachers, obviously they are not supposed to undergo TET. Since there are various kind of teachers appointed under the Rules in Rajasthan, we direct the NCTE to specify in State of Rajasthan categories of Teachers, which are exempted as per para 4 of the said Notification. Let it be done within a period of one month.

***************************
(A) Whether in absence of any eligibility or qualification in the rules the State Government can be permitted to conduct TET without amending the service rules made under Article 309,Constitution of India on the basis of notification dated 23.08.2010 which the Division Bench held vide order dated 13.4.2011 that it is not statutory in character?

“Answer to question (A):-

The State Government has amended the Service Rules and even otherwise, in our opinion, as Notification dated 23rd August, 2010 was having statutory force of Section 23(1) of the Act of 2009, it was open to the NCTE to prescribe holding of TET even without amending the Service Rules. However, as already stated, Rajasthan Punchayati Raj Rules,1996 have been amended vide notification dated 11.5.2011. Thus, question (A) stands answered accordingly.

----------------

RAJASTHAN PANCHAYTEE RAJ NE RTE ACT KO APPNA LIYAA, ISLEEYE KOEE SAMASYA NAIN HAI

***************************

(B) Whether in view of the fact that stay order was in existence on 06.05.2011 upon conducting the TET in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3749/2011 an order for modifying the order dated 15.4.2011 passed in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3068/2011 could be made allowing the State Government to go ahead with conducting the TET examination?

Answer to question (B):-

The question (B) has assumed academic significance as we have heard the matters and decided the same on merits by this common order.

****************************
(C) Whether once opinion is expressed by the Division Bench that notification dated 23.8.2010 is not statutory in character, the learned Single Bench can pass order permitting the State Government to conduct TET examination which is not even enumerated in the service rules as eligibility or qualification on the basis of notification dated 23.8.2010 which is admittedly found to be administrative instruction by the Division Bench?

Answer to question (C)-

As to question (C), we are of the opinion that since Notification dated 23rd August, 2010 was issued under section 23(1) of the Act of 2009, therefore, it has statutory force. Apart from this, the State Government has amended the Service Rules. Even otherwise, it was open to the NCTE to prescribe conducting of TET. The notification dated 23.8.2010 cannot be said to be administrative instructions, it has legislative force. The prescription of eligibility qualifications has statutory force.

-----------
 RTE ACT EK KANOONEE PRAVDHAN HAI NA KI KOEE PRSASHNIK 

NIRDESH. IS ACT ARTHAAT KANOON KA PAALAN KARNA HEE HAI


************************************

(D) Whether in absence of eligibility prescribed in the rules the State Government will suffer any irreparable injury in not conducting TET till adjudication of the matter and whether while conducting TET and declaring any candidate unsuccessful and thereby denying consideration for appointment on the post of Teacher under the existing rules is legal?

Answer to question (D)-

The question (D) has been rendered unnecessary in view of the final decision being rendered by us. Apart from this, the question has assumed academic importance as the Service Rules has been amended prescribing conducting of TET.

Holding of TET is necessary for manning the teachers in the various schools at large. Thus, non-holding of TET would be detrimental to the public interest as primary and upper primary schools cannot be left without qualified teachers which is dependent upon holding of TET. Hence, holding of TET is necessary for the interest of the children.

***************************

(E) Whether the State Government can withhold recruitment on the ground that first they will conduct TET and thereafter proceed for prescribing qualification in the rules?”

Answer to question (E)

As already stated above, holding of TET is necessary for the recruitment to be made in the schools. Thus, there is no question of State Government withholding recruitment as after TET, recruitment is open to be made.

For the reasons stated above, the interim stay is vacated. The respondents are free to hold the TET examination. The prayer of the petitioners regarding inclusion of qualification of B.Com. in the group of qualification of graduation in the eligibility criteria has already been allowed. The respondents shall not insist on the qualification of having 45% or 50% marks, as the case may be, in the bachelor's degree or master's degree etc. or any other equivalent qualification, in case incumbents have obtained admission in the requisite courses such as B.A., B.Com., B.Sc., B.Ed., B.El.Ed, Senior Secondary etc. prior to prescription of the minimum qualifying marks by NCTE vide notifications dated 27.9.2007 and 31.8.2009. It is made clear that the incumbents, who have obtained the B.Ed. etc. before the minimum qualifications were prescribed vide notifications dated 27.9.2007 and 31.8.2009, shall be allowed to appear in the TET Examination. The incumbents, who have passed out B.Ed. Course from Jammu & Kashmir, have to be dealt with on similar yard sticks in case the qualification is otherwise recognized. Let NCTE specify categories of teachers under para 4 of Notification dated 23.8.2010. As prayed by NCTE, let amended notification be issued within one month covering aforesaid aspects.

With the aforesaid directions, the writ petitions stand disposed of accordingly. The stay applications also stand disposed.

*********************************




 UPTET  /RTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com


CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

TET SARKARI NAUKRI News - SUPREME COURT ON TET TEACHER MATTER ISSUE FOR RAJASTHAN TEACHER SELECTION - JUDGEMENT PART -1

TET SARKARI NAUKRI   News   -
SUPREME COURT ON TET TEACHER MATTER ISSUE FOR RAJASTHAN TEACHER SELECTION - JUDGEMENT PART -1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AT JODHPUR
1. D.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3964/2011
Sushil Sompura & Ors. Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
2. D.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2584/2011
Mahendra Singh & Ors. Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
3. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3061/2011
Narayan Lal & Ors. Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
4. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3205/2011
Pawan Kumar & Anr. Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
5. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3210/2011
Shaitan Singh Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
6. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3223/2011
Vijaylakshmi Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
7. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3224/2011
Jeevan Singh Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
8. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3225/2011
Sangeeta Hada Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
9. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3249/2011
Narendra Kumar Delu & Ors. Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
10. D.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3258/2011
Asu Ram Jatiya & Ors. Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
11. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3261/2011
Jai Kishan Saharan & ors. Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
12. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3267/2011
Deena Ram & Ors. Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
13. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3273/2011
Govind Singh & Ors. Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
14. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3274/2011
Mahesh Dave & Ors. Vs. State (Education) & ors.
15. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3275/2011
Mahaveer Prasad Bagerwal & Ors. Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
16. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3277/2011
Ghewar Singh Rathore & Ors. Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
17. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3280/2011
Ugam Singh & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
2
18. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3282/2011
Rakesh Kumar Utreja & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
19. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3283/2011
Raj Kumar Joshi Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
20. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3284/2011
Sunil Kumar Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
21. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3286/2011
Hari Om Sharma & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
22. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3290/2011
Gajendra Singh Ranawat & ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
23. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3318/2011
Seema Jalori & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & ors.
24. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3320/2011
Sahadev Ram & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
25. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3321/2011
Ved Prakash & ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & ors.
26. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3324/2011
Pawan Kumar Pareek & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
27. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3327/2011
Jagram & Ors. Vs. State (Ele. Education) & Ors.
28. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3331/2011
Bhupendra & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
29. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3341/2011
Sanjay Kumar & ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
30. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3342/2011
Deen Dayal Sharma & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
31. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3390/2011
Tarun Paliwal & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & ors.
32. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3696/2011
Susheela Kumari & Anr. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
33. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3848/2011
Narna Ram & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
34. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3913/2011
Umed Singh & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
35. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4105/2011
Bharat Kamliya (Salvi) & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
3
36. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4106/2011
Akram Ansari & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
37. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4108/2011
Maniram & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
38. D.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4403/2011
Laxman Lal Patel & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
39. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4416/2011
Hanuman Singh Rathore Vs. State (Edu.) & Ors.
40. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4417/2011
Om Prakash & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & ors.
41. D.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4421/2011
Vijender Kumar Sharma & Ors. Vs. State (Edu.) & ors.
42. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4436/2011
Maha Prakash Sharma & Os. Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
43. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4444/2011
Mangu Singh Bhati & Anr. Vs. State (Education) & Ors.
Date of Order : : 20.05.2011
PRESENT
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ARUN MISHRA
HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE KAILASH CHANDRA JOSHI
Mr.P.R.Mehta ]
Mr.P.S.Chundawat ]
Mr.Shambhoo Singh ]
Mr.S.R.Godara ]
Mr.Narpat Singh ]
Mr.H.S.Sidhu ]
Mr.G.R.Bhari ]
Mr.Vishwajeet Joshi ]
Mr.D.S.Sodha ]
Mr.Awar Dan Charan ]
Mr.Trilok Joshi ]
Mr.Pankaj Sharma ]
Mr.Tribhuva Gupta ]
Mr.V.N.Kalla ]-for the petitioners.
Mr.Sandeep Saruparia ]
Mr.Sunil Beniwal ]
Mr.R.S.Charan ]
Mr.Sukesh Bhati ]
Mr.Vijay Raj Bishnoi ]
Mr.R.C.Joshi ]
Mr.V.R.Choudhary ]
Mr.Manoj Purohit ]
Mr.Manish Patel ]
Mr.O.P.Kumawat ]
Mr.Rohitash Singh ]
Mr.Vikas Bijarnia ]
Mr.B.S.Sandhu ]
Mr.Sumer Singh ]
Mr.Anand Purohit, AAG ]
4
Mr.Kuldeep Mathur ]
Mr.K.R.Bishnoi ]
Mr.D.S.Gaur ]
Mr.Rakesh Arora ]- for the respondents.
ORDER
BY THE COURT (Per Hon'ble Arun Mishra, CJ)
In these writ petitions, the petitioners have prayed for relief to quash the Gazettee Notification dated 23rd August, 2010 issued by the National Council for Teacher Education (hereinafter referred to as “the NCTE”) in exercise of the powers conferred by  Sub-section (1) of Section 23 of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 2009”) laying down minimum qualifications to be eligible for appointment as a Teacher in Class I to VIII in a school referred to in clause (n) of Section 2 of the Act of 2009. Prayer has also been been made by the  petitioners to quash the condition of having minimum 45% or 50% marks in graduation. In some of the matters, prayer has been made to include the qualification of B.Com. also in graduation. Prayer has also been made to declare that the Notification dated 23.8.2010 shall operate prospectively. In some of the petitions, the petitioners have prayed that as they have passed graduation from the University in Jammu and Kashmir, the respondents be directed to ignore the minimum percentage in the graduation. Prayer has also been made in some of the petitions that Vidhyarthi Mitra and Serva Shiksha Karmik (CRCF) may not be compelled to qualify the Teacher Eligibility Test (hereinafter referred to as “the TET”).




 UPTET  /RTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com


CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

RTET SARKARI NAUKRI News : सरकार जल्द लेगी यह फैसला, मिलेगी हजारों युवाओं को नौकरी

RTET SARKARI NAUKRI News  : सरकार जल्द लेगी यह फैसला, मिलेगी हजारों युवाओं को नौकरी

 Tags :    rajasthan govt     supreme court    rajasthan tet     tet petition
rajasthan govt to withdraw tet petition form supreme court


    13 thousands teachers and 2500 other workers may out of job

RTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher Eligibility Test Updates / Teacher Recruitment  /SARKARINAUKRI NEWS  / SARKARI NAUKRI News

http://joinrtet.blogspot.com/

http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com/


राजे सरकार लाचार, 16 हजार लोगों की नौकरी खतरे में

सचिन मुद्गल/अजमेर। तृतीय श्रेणी शिक्षकों की भर्ती में शिक्षक पात्रता परीक्षा (टेट) में 60 प्रतिशत अंकों की अनिवार्यता के खिलाफ सर्वोच्च न्यायालय में दायर अपील राज्य सरकार वापस लेने की तैयारी कर रही है।

राज्य सरकार न्यायालय से मामले के जल्द निस्तारण के लिए अन्य विकल्पों पर भी विचार का आग्रह करेगी। सरकार का प्रयास है कि शिक्षकों की कमी से जूझ रहे प्रारंभिक शिक्षा विभाग को जल्द से जल्द शिक्षक मिले और भर्ती के इंतजार में अटके हजारों अभ्यर्थियों को रोजगार मिल सके।

राज्य सरकार की ओर से गत वर्ष सितम्बर में जिला परिषदों के जरिए प्रदेश में करीब 20 हजार तृतीय श्रेणी शिक्षकों की भर्ती के लिए परीक्षा आयोजित की थी।

तृतीय श्रेणी शिक्षक भर्ती में टेट के अंकों में विकलांगों को 15 प्रतिशत, अनुसूचित जाति और जनजाति की महिला को 10 प्रतिशत, अनुसूचित जाति, जनजाति और अन्य पिछड़ा वर्ग के पुरूषों को 5 प्रतिशत और सामान्य महिला को 5 प्रतिशत की छूट दी गई।

भर्ती परीक्षा के परिणाम निकलने से पहले ही एक याचिका पर सुनवाई करते हुए राजस्थान उच्च न्यायालय ने तृतीय श्रेणी शिक्षक भर्ती के लिए टेट में सभी वर्गो के लिए न्यूनतम 60 प्रतिशत अंकों की अनिवार्यता कर दी।

हाईकोर्ट ने किसी भी श्रेणी में अधिकतम पांच प्रतिशत ही छूट देने का निर्णय किया। उच्च न्यायालय के निर्णय के खिलाफ राज्य सरकार ने सर्वोच्च न्यायालय में अपील दायर की।

प्रदेश में प्राथमिक और उच्च प्राथमिक विद्यालयों में शिक्षकों के खाली पदों के कारण बिगड़ रही शिक्षण व्यवस्था को सुधारने के लिए सर्वोच्च न्यायालय में दायर अपील पर जल्द सुनवाई के लिए अक्टूबर में विशेष सुनवाई याचिका दायर की।

सोमवार को गृहमंत्री गुलाबचंद कटारिया की सदारत में गठित मंत्रिमंडलीय उप समिति की बैठक में सरकार ने शिक्षक भर्ती का रास्ता साफ करने के लिए अपील वापस लेने का विचार किया।

समिति ने यह भी सुझाव दिया है कि जिन चयनित अभ्यर्थियों के टेट में 60 प्रतिशत से अधिक अंक हैं उन्हें नियुक्ति देने की मंजूरी सर्वोच्च न्यायालय से प्राप्त की जाए।

साथ ही सुप्रीम कोर्ट से भर्ती के संबंध में गाइड लाइन तय करने का आग्रह किया जाए। इस सम्बंध में माध्यमिक शिक्षा विभाग के सचिव नरेश पाल गंगवार ने मंगलवार शाम सुप्रीम कोर्ट में सरकार के वकील सोली सोराबजी से मुलाकात कर सरकार की राय से उन्हें अवगत कराया।

इनका कहना है
हम शिक्षकों की भर्ती कराने के लिए हर संभव प्रयास कर रहे हैं। सुप्रीम कोर्ट में दायर अपील को वापस लेने, टेट में 60 प्रतिशत से अधिक अंक वाले चयनित अभ्यर्थियों को नियुक्ति दिलाने सहित अन्य मुद्दों पर विचार किया है। सरकार के दो सचिव सुप्रीम कोर्ट के वरिष्ठ अधिवक्ता सोली सोराबजी से मीटिंग करने भेजे हैं।
गुलाबचंद कटारिया, गृह मंत्री और मंत्री मंडलीय उप समिति के अध्यक्ष

News Sabhaar : rajasthanpatrika.patrika.com Wed, 03 Dec 2014 12:17:26 | Rajasthan Hindi News

B. Ed Holders can not give exam of Primary Level - I ( Grade 3rd Teacher Recruitment in Rajasthan)

टैट के फस्र्ट लेवल पास बीएडधारियों को सुप्रीम कोर्ट से राहत नहीं

Supreme Court : B. Ed Holders can not give level - I teacher exam - Grade 3rd Teacher recruitment in Rajasthan

तृतीय श्रेणी शिक्षक भर्ती परीक्षा के लेवल वन में नहीं बैठ सकेंगे बीएड धारी

As per NCTE Guidelines, B.Ed holder are eligible upto 1st jan 2012 for Primary Teacher Job

जोधपुर। सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने टेट के लेवल फस्र्ट पास बीएड धारकों को तृतीय श्रेणी शिक्षक भर्ती परीक्षा के लेवल वन के योग्य मानने बाबत राजस्थान हाईकोर्ट की खंडपीठ के आदेश को चुनौती देने वाली विशेष अनुमति याचिका की सुनवाई में संबंधित पक्षों को नोटिस जारी करते हुए भर्ती परीक्षा के प्रोसेस को याचिका के निस्तारण के अधीन कर दिया है। गौरतलब है कि तृतीय श्रेणी भर्ती परीक्षा शनिवार को जिला स्तर पर आयोजित की जा रही है, जिसमें अब लेवल वन पास बीएड धारी शिरकत नहीं कर सकेंगे।

आरटेट परीक्षा के लेवल फस्र्ट उत्तीर्ण बीएड धारकों के पक्ष में राजस्थान हाईकोर्ट की एकल पीठ ने 19 मई 2012 को आदेश पारित करते हुए 2 जून को आयोजित होने वाली तृतीय श्रेणी भर्ती परीक्षा के लेवल फस्र्ट के योग्य माना था। बाद में राज्य सरकार ने हाईकोर्ट की खंडपीठ में अपील दायर की। मुख्‍य न्यायाधीश अरुण मिश्रा व न्यायाधीश संगीत लोढ़ा की खंडपीठ ने 25 मई को एकलपीठ के आदेश पर रोक लगाते हुए भर्ती परीक्षा को अपील के निस्तारण के अधीन किया था। खंडपीठ के इस आदेश को चुनौती देने के लिए प्रार्थी वीराराम व अन्य ने सुप्रीम कोर्ट में विशेष अनुमति याचिका दायर की थी।


न्यूज़ साभार : Bhaskar.com (1.6.12)